Two first-innings 387s, a modest 193-run chase, and yet a 22-run gap that will sting India long after they left the Lord's pavilion. England held their nerve on the fifth day to take a 2-1 lead in the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, winning a Test that swung between hope and heartbreak. Ravindra Jadeja fought to the end with an unbeaten 61, but England’s seamers, led by Ben Stokes and Jofra Archer with three wickets each, shut the door at the home of cricket. It was the latest chapter of India vs England that delivered drama by the session.
The surface never turned spiteful, but Lord’s had enough movement with the Dukes ball and a hint of slope-assisted seam to keep batters honest. India’s chase slowed into caution, and that tempo shift was the opening England needed. When the ball was new, England attacked the stumps; when it got older, they tested the ribcage and the patience. India never fully broke free.
How England closed it out at Lord’s
Day five started with India still in the game, the target close enough to taste yet far enough to test nerve. England’s plan was simple: pound a channel, cut off singles, and make every mistake expensive. It worked. Chris Woakes, who had been tidy and relentless all match, landed the blow that changed the morning by removing Nitish Kumar Reddy right on the stroke of lunch. Earlier, Archer had knocked over Washington Sundar to dent India’s balance. Those two wickets left Jadeja with only the tail for company.
Jadeja responded with clarity. He farmed the strike, used soft hands to ride bounce, and cashed in whenever England missed their length. Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Siraj hung in, but England’s discipline meant the partnerships never stretched far enough. Stokes slid into the attack with that familiar mix of grit and theatre, banging it into the pitch, setting clever fields, and daring India to take the aerial route. Archer, meanwhile, kept the stumps in play and forced errors with pace and lift.
KL Rahul was India’s standout across the match. His first-innings 100 was classical Lord’s batting: leaves outside off, late hands, and control under the eyes. He added 39 in the chase and looked the one batter who could soak up pressure and still move the game. But a breakdown in running between the wickets with Rishabh Pant proved costly. That run-out didn’t just cost a wicket; it rattled the chase and gave England belief that the squeeze was working.
The first innings had set up the tension. Joe Root’s 104 was the calm at the center of England’s 387, a masterclass in playing late and milking the slope. India matched it punch for punch: Rahul’s century and Pant’s brisk 74 ensured a rare first-innings tie at Lord’s. But India also bled a chunk of extras across the match—byes, the odd no-ball, and misfields that kept England ticking. In a low-scoring finish, those leaked runs felt bigger with every dot ball on day five.
When England batted second, Washington Sundar turned the game briefly with 4 for 22, finding seam and drawing edges as the ball kissed the surface. Mohammed Siraj backed him up with 2 for 31, hitting that nagging length from the Pavilion End. England still scratched out enough to set 193, and that was the margin India couldn’t bridge. The chase wasn’t an impossible one; it just needed one top-order stand to break England’s lines. It never came.
- Turning point 1: The Rahul-Pant mix-up that led to a run-out, breaking India’s rhythm in the chase.
- Turning point 2: Stokes and Archer’s twin spells after drinks, which forced India deeper into their shell.
- Turning point 3: Woakes removing Nitish Kumar Reddy right before lunch on day five, pushing India into the tail too early.
- Turning point 4: Extras conceded across both innings that nudged England’s totals forward in a tight match.
India’s approach, the Lord’s story, and the road ahead
India’s chase felt more cautious than controlled. The plan seemed to be: wear the bowlers down, take the game deep, hope the ball softens. But against England at Lord’s, that often hands control to the fielding side. The hosts packed the off-side, kept short midwickets in play, and settled into a length that forced India to play but not score. The dot-ball pressure eventually manufactured mistakes: the ill-timed cut, a mistimed pull, and the fateful run-out.
This defeat also feeds into a broader Lord’s pattern. India have had famous wins here—1986 under Kapil Dev’s side, 2014 powered by Ajinkya Rahane’s 103 and Ishant Sharma’s 7 for 74, and the commanding 151-run win in 2021—yet Lord’s is still a venue that demands discipline. The slope plays tricks with alignment, the Dukes ball punishes hard hands, and the morning session is rarely gentle. You don’t so much take a chase at Lord’s as you build it, session by careful session. India built the base, not the bridge.
Individually, there were bright spots. Rahul’s century reasserted his red-ball credentials at a venue where technique is currency. Jadeja has become India’s nerve center at No. 6/7—calm, calculating, and fearless when batting with the tail. Sundar’s 4 for 22 underscored the value of a flexible all-rounder who can pivot between holding and striking spells. Siraj’s control was tighter than his numbers; he kept England honest when they threatened to run away in the second innings.
For England, this was a victory built on faith in their seamers and sharp match awareness. Root’s century set the tone, but the bowling unit’s patience under Stokes’s captaincy decided the game. Archer’s rhythm has grown with each spell; his seams stayed upright, his lengths fuller than raw pace would suggest. Stokes the bowler is all heartbeat—heavy lengths, chest-high challenges, and plans that evolve in real time. Woakes was the glue, especially with that pre-lunch strike on day five that gutted India’s chase map.
Could India have been bolder? Yes. Singles were left on the table to deep point and third. Rotating strike earlier—especially when Archer and Stokes were mid-spell—might have scrambled England’s fields sooner. India also paid for a top-order slide that made Jadeja’s job too big too early. When the tail arrived, England were already circling.
The bigger picture is clear: England 2-1 up in a five-Test series, India with two games to fix tempo and intent. The young core—the Shubman Brigade—will know they can’t carry a defensive chase into the final hour at these venues. Expect selection scrutiny around balance: a batter who can lift the run rate in the middle, a bowler who can bat long at No. 8, and fielding standards that don’t leak momentum. With World Test Championship points always in the background, small margins like extras and missed singles matter more than they look on the scorecard.
What next? India need early stability and mid-innings urgency, not one without the other. They also need to protect partnerships—no soft breaks, no chaos running. England, on the other hand, will bank the confidence from Lord’s and press the same pressure points: tight channels early, heavy lengths when the pitch tires, and fields that strangle scoring routes. The series is still alive, and after a thriller like this, the reset won’t be tactical alone—it will be mental.
LEAVE A Comments